A non-phenomenological model of Conceptual Spaces [*Best Explanation*]
One of the most serious problems connected with G¨ardenfors’ conceptual spaces
is that these have, for him, a phenomenological connotation. In other words,
if, for example, we take, the conceptual space of colours this, according to
G¨ardenfors, must be able to represent the geometry of colour concepts in relation to how colours are given to us.
Now, since we believe that this type of approach is bound to come to grief
as a consequence of the well-known problem connected with the subjectivity of
the so-called ‘qualia’, e.g., the specific and incommunicable quality of my visual
perception of the rising Sun or of that ripe orange etc. etc., we have chosen a
non phenomenological approach to conceptual spaces in which we substitute the
expression ‘measurement’ for the expression ‘perception’, and consider a cognitive agent which interacts with the environment by means of the measurements
taken by its sensors rather than a human being.
Of course, we are well aware of the controversial nature of our non phenomenological approach to conceptual spaces. But, since our main task in this
paper is characterizing a rational agent with the view of providing a model for
artificial agents, it follows that our non-phenomenological approach to conceptual spaces is justified independently of our opinions on qualia and their possible
representations within conceptual spaces
Although the cognitive agent we have in mind is not a human being, the
idea of simulating perception by means of measurement is not so far removed
from biology.
To see this, consider that human beings, and other animals, to
survive need to have a fairly good ability to estimate distance. The frog unable
to determine whether a fly is ‘within reach’ or not is, probably, not going to live
a long and happy life.
Our CA is provided with sensors which are capable, within a certain interval
of intensities, of registering different intensities of stimulation. For example, let
us assume that CA has a visual perception of a green object h.
If CA makes of the
measure of the colour of h its present stereotype of green then it can, by means
6 Actually, we do not agree with G¨ardenfors when he asserts that:
Properties. . . form a special case of concepts. [4], chapter 4, §4.1, p. 101.
7 A set S is convex if and only if whenever a, b ∈ S and c is between a and b then
c ∈ S.
27
of a comparison of different measurements, introduce an ordering of gradations
of green with respect to the stereotype; and, of course, it can also distinguish the
colour of the stereotype from the colour of other red, blue, yellow, etc. objects.
In other words, in this way CA is able to introduce a ‘green dimension’ into
its colour space, a dimension within which the measure of the colour of the
stereotype can be taken to perform the rˆole of 0.
The formal model of a conceptual space that at this point immediately springs
to mind is that of a metric space, i.e., it is that of a set X endowed with a metric.
However, since the metric space X which is the candidate for being a model
of a conceptual space has dimensions, dimensions the elements of which are
associated with coordinates which are the outcomes of (possible) measurements
made by CA, perhaps a better model of a conceptual space might be an ndimensional vector space V over a field K like, for example, Rn (with the usual
inner product and norm) on R.
Although this suggestion is very interesting, we cannot help noticing that an
important disanalogy between an n-dimensional vector space V over a field K,
and the ‘biological conceptual space’ that V is supposed to model is that human,
animal, and artificial sensors are strongly non-linear. In spite of its cogency, at
this stage we are not going to dwell on this difficulty, because: (1) we intend
to examine the ‘ideal’ case first; and because (2) we hypothesize that it is always possible to map a perceptual space into a conceptual space where linearity
is preserved either by performing, for example, a small-signal approach, or by
means of a projection onto a linear space, as it is performed in kernel systems
No comments: